Build from scratch
There's no system covering the process. Today you manage it in Excel, paper, emails or scattered tools. It works while the volume is low and the person who maintains it is available.
Signals:
When no off-the-shelf software fits how your company works, we build yours. With functional requirements, UAT and code delivered as your property.
We guide you with quick questions and define whether this service is right for your case.
Filter before you move on. If your company sees itself in any of these signals, keep reading. If not, we will point you to a better-fit service.
Almost every company arrives from one of these two points. The process adapts to yours.
There's no system covering the process. Today you manage it in Excel, paper, emails or scattered tools. It works while the volume is low and the person who maintains it is available.
Signals:
You have an ERP or other base software covering the standard processes. But there are proprietary flows the system doesn't contemplate, and you resolve them in parallel, by hand or with loose tools.
Signals:
In both scenarios, the first step is the same: a requirements gathering that turns your operation into technical specification. There we define what to build first, what stays out of initial scope and what criteria determine the system is right.
Three main formats. The build process is the same for all three.
For: Companies replacing Excel, paper or manual processes with a controlled system.
Typical cases: Logistics control, approval flows, operational traceability, cross-area consolidation, planning, request management.
By browser, no installation, with permissions by user.
For: Companies with an ERP or other base system that need to extend it with processes the vendor didn't contemplate.
Typical cases: Specific approval modules, management reports with data from multiple sources, controlled integration via API.
We don't replace what works; we complement what's missing.
For: Companies extending operations toward clients, suppliers or management with analytics.
Typical cases: Request portals for third parties, management dashboards with live indicators, document systems with controlled access.
Dashboards get built when the underlying data is reliable. We don't promise reports on dirty data.
Clear limits prevent misunderstandings. These scopes are not part of the base plan.
SLA and hours are defined from the start. Extended availability is quoted as an additional agreement.
Development is governed by approved scope. Scope changes are managed as additional phases.
Not included by default. If your project requires it, it's quoted and planned explicitly.
We connect systems with standard interfaces. Without an API, we define an honest strategy in the requirements phase, not promises the infrastructure can't deliver.
We include specific onboarding and documentation. Mass training is quoted separately.
If the system needs external tools with licensing costs, they're quoted separately or you acquire them directly.
Each phase with a concrete deliverable and progress criteria. We don't move to the next without validating the previous one.
Sessions with the sponsor and your key users. We map the current flow, define rules, exceptions, permissions and input/output data.
Functional spec + scope + acceptance criteria + prioritized backlog + flow map.
We define technologies, database, deployment (cloud or on-premise), integrations and security structure. You don't need to understand the details; you do need to make the business decisions: where your data lives, who has access, how it scales.
Documented technical decisions + refined effort estimate per module.
We build by modules with internal reviews before each presentation. We don't deliver everything at the end; we deliver functional parts for incremental validation.
Functional modules per iteration + change log + test environment.
Internal QA verifies the system meets the spec. Then UAT with your key users, guided by the Phase 0 acceptance criteria. It's not "try it out and see"; it's formal validation with real scenarios.
QA report + signed UAT minutes as go-live condition.
Production deployment, specific onboarding with your key users and initial monitoring.
System in production + technical and user documentation + repository transfer.
Minor fixes, functional improvements, technical updates and support for operational contingencies.
Base bucket of 10 hours/month, adjustable. Available after go-live and the 30-day warranty.
Technology selected by project context, not by vendor preference. If your IT team works with a different stack, we evaluate it in the requirements phase.
Fullstack · Backend · Frontend · DBAs · QA · DevOps / infrastructure. The exact profile is assigned by complexity.
Three frequent patterns. Your case gets defined in the requirements phase.
Situation
Production control, planning or product traceability managed in spreadsheets. It works at low volume; as the team grows, it scales badly and depends on one person.
System built
Internal web app with the digitized flow, data entry with validations, roles by function, traceability of every action and live reports.
How it operates
Your team works from the browser. The rules live in the system, not in the memory of whoever maintained the file.
Situation
ERP that handles accounting and standard stock. But the approval flow has tiers by amount and area, the reports cross several modules and internal requests live in email.
System built
Complementary module integrated via API, with configurable tiers, consolidated reporting and requests with statuses and owners.
How it operates
The ERP keeps doing its job. The module covers what was missing, connected to the existing data.
Situation
Requests from clients or suppliers arrive through email or WhatsApp. The status is known internally; the external party has no way to check it.
System built
Self-service portal with authentication. The external user logs in, checks status, downloads documents and receives notifications. Your team administers from the same system.
How it operates
Clients query directly. Your team stops answering status questions and focuses on requests that need attention.
These patterns combine or extend. What doesn't change: serious requirements, phased development, formal UAT and code delivered as your property.
We publish the reference price. The exact cost gets closed in the requirements phase.
Build + delivery
Covers functional requirements, technical design, phased development, QA, UAT, go-live, documentation and code transfer. Payment model: by project milestones (down payment, partial deliveries and go-live). Not all charged upfront.
Monthly operation
Base bucket of 10 hours/month, adjustable: improvements and tweaks, 8×5 support and basic monitoring. More hours, differentiated SLAs or specific coverage are quoted case by case. Available after go-live and the 30-day warranty.
The fee varies by complexity: modules, flows, integrations and technical requirements. We define it in the requirements phase with clear acceptance criteria before committing budget.
Tell us the process you need to systematize and we'll guide you on scope and estimated cost.
The first step is the functional requirements phase. In that conversation we define what to build, what stays out of initial scope and what criteria determine the system is right, before committing budget.
Chat on WhatsAppTell us the process you need to systematize. We'll guide you on scope and the next step.